Blog - Page 9 of 16 - Historical Society of the New York Courts

Revisiting Our Goals

January 9, 2019September 13, 2019Historical Society of the New York CourtsThe Rule of Law, Uncategorized, Garfinkel Essay Scholarship, New York Legal History

Photo: Central segment of mural at Appellate Division, First Department Courthouse

We are now a few days into the new year, which is the perfect time to make some resolutions at the Society! But before we look forward, we want to look back and see what we’ve accomplished and how these accomplishments will guide us in 2019. Nine years have passed since we produced our About the Society video, which featured interviews with many people instrumental to the Society’s work, including founder Hon. Judith S. Kaye and president Hon. Albert M. Rosenblatt. This video provided, and continues to provide, a brief overview of what the Society does to preserve, protect, and promote the legal history of New York. We discussed our work documenting and preserving courthouses, our publications, a potential museum, the David A. Garkfinkel Essay Scholarship, our programs and lectures, oral histories, and the broader context of New York law. What have we accomplished since we filmed this video in 2010? Let’s take a closer look!

Publications

Each year, the Society produces an issue of Judicial Notice, our journal which features articles written by those interested in New York’s legal history. The 2019 edition of Judicial Notice is currently in production, and is a special issue on Native American legal history in New York State.

Since 2010, we’ve streamlined the journal’s aesthetics to make it more readable, while staying true to the spirit of scholarly publications. We’ve expanded the articles we publish to include more diverse topics. We accept article submissions year-round, and our authors can submit their articles to other journals at the same time. This is excellent for authors who are passionate about their research and want to share as much as possible!

The Oneida Indian Nation: America’s First Ally — A History No Longer Ignored

November 14, 2018September 13, 2019Historical Society of the New York CourtsNative American Heritage Month, Uncategorized, New York Legal History

In honor of Native American Heritage Month and in anticipation of our upcoming program Tribal Courts in New York: Case Study of the Oneida Indian Nation on Nov. 20th, we bring you this article written by the Oneida Indian Nation on their history and culture.

Photo: Oneida Indian Nation Representative Ray Halbritter with a framed copy of the U.S. Constitution and the 1794 Treaty of Canandaigua.

The story of America’s founding is often left incomplete in the history textbooks that repeatedly omit Native voices. The Oneida Indian Nation is proud of its legacy as America’s First Allies, but sadly, many generations of American citizens are unaware of our ancestors’ impact on the American Revolution and the establishment of the United States.

In the fight for independence from a tyrannical king, the colonists were aided in several major battles in the Revolutionary War by the Oneida Indian Nation of the Haudenosaunee Confederacy. Our ancestors, opposed to the other Haudenosaunee Nations that decided to support the British, made the extraordinarily difficult decision to fight for the fledgling United States and became forever known as America’s First Allies.

“Oneidas at the Battle of Oriskany” painting by artist Don Troiani

That friendship was forged — and cemented — after the Battle of Oriskany on August 6, 1777, preventing the British from advancing an expeditionary force intended to join other British forces marching south from Canada. If the two forces united, they may have succeeded in seizing Fort Stanwix, a critical trading post in the northeast, and divided the colonies in half.

Later that winter, several Oneida, including Han Yerry and Polly Cooper, travelled alongside the Marquis de Lafayette to aid Gen. George Washington and his troops in Valley Forge. They brought with them around 60 bushels of corn, immediately boosting the morale of the hungry soldiers at a critical time during the war.

Historical Court Records at the New York State Archives: Available for Research, Grants for Conservation and Digitization — Part 2

October 24, 2018September 13, 2019Historical Society of the New York CourtsUncategorized, Court Records, Early Legal History, Historical Research, New York Legal History, The Rule of Law

This article was written by Dr. James D. Folts, head of Researcher Services at the New York State Archives. In his last blog post, Dr. Folts described the move of court records to the State Archives in Albany as well as how this move has facilitated a growth in interest from researchers. In this second half, Dr. Folts describes the condition of records when they were received, and what steps are being taken to ensure preservation and public access of the documents into the future.

Photo: Supreme Court of Judicature, People vs. John Munro and 44 others, indictment for treason, April 1780. [NYSA JN522-17 file P-1648]

This mass indictment contains witness depositions accusing Munro and others, residents of rural Albany County, of being “enemies of this state.” During Gen. John Burgoyne’s invasion of northern New York in 1777, they either served in the British army or supplied it with goods and services. Supreme Court minutes indicate that all the defendants were convicted in absentia, without jury trial, six months later. The multi-page document is soiled and damaged. This indictment and many others will be conserved with the support of the “Save America’s Treasures” grant.

Preservation Needs

Records of the pre-1847 trial courts in the State Archives are now stored in a climate-controlled, secure storage facility and are available for research. Many of them are in poor physical condition. The paper documents have high rag content, making them initially very durable. Documents stored upstate generally remain intact and quite flexible. But paper records formerly maintained in New York City and transferred to Albany in 2017 are often breaking up at the folds and edges. Atmospheric pollutants and temperature oscillations accelerated chemical reactions, causing severe embrittlement of paper and requiring that the records be handled with great care. (The many parchment documents are generally in good condition except for scattered vermin damage.) Microfilm reproductions are available for some of the court records and are used whenever possible to avoid risking damage to fragile originals.

The preservation and access needs of the historic court records have long been recognized. The New York County Clerk’s Office had the early court minute books rehoused by a conservator, and Unified Court System staff inventoried and boxed all the records transferred to the State Archives in 2017. Since then the New York State Archives and the Archives Partnership Trust have obtained important grant support for the preservation and digitization of selected records:

New York DAR Conservation Grant

The New York organization of the Daughters of the American Revolution has taken great interest in the state’s historic court records from the Revolutionary War period. A $10,000 grant has defrayed costs of re-boxing the extremely fragile minute books of the Supreme Court of Judicature and digitizing those books. The digital reproductions will be available through the State Archives’ online “Digital Collections.” Examples of Supreme Court filed documents from the Revolutionary period have been digitized and will be displayed on the State Archives’ web site with interpretive text.

“Save America’s Treasures” Conservation Grant

New York Supreme Court minutes, criminal case papers, and other documents from the Revolutionary era will be conserved with a “Save America’s Treasures” grant from the National Park Service [See news release at https://www.imls.gov/news-events/news-releases/48-million-grants-go-save-americas-treasures]. On September 21, 2018, the National Park Service announced grants for 16 projects in 12 states, including a $125,760 grant to the New York State Archives Partnership Trust for conservation of historical court records and other important documents of the Revolutionary War.

Historical Court Records at the New York State Archives: Available for Research, Grants for Conservation and Digitization – Part 1

October 17, 2018October 24, 2018Historical Society of the New York CourtsNew York Legal History, The Rule of Law, Uncategorized, Court Records, Early Legal History, Historical Research

This article was written by Dr. James D. Folts, head of Researcher Services at the New York State Archives.

Photo: Supreme Court of Judicature roll of attorneys admitted to practice. [NYSA series JN541]

Parchment was used for the rolls of attorneys admitted to practice in the Supreme Court of Judicature. This long roll, comprised of parchment sheets sewn together and wound on a wooden dowel, shows the names and dates of attorneys admitted in 1847.

Court Records as Sources for History

Archival records of New York’s Unified Court System contain unique, valuable information about court operations and caseloads, trends in civil litigation and criminal prosecution, changes in civil and criminal procedure, the decisions of judges, the practices of trial attorneys, the rights and status of persons, and the overall impact of the courts on New York’s society since the seventeenth century. These records often provide the only documentation of ordinary people, including those who were marginalized, especially in the colonial and early national periods.

Many historical records of New York’s courts have been lost over time. An important success in preserving a major collection of those that survive occurred in early 2017, when nearly 2,000 cubic feet of records of the Supreme Court of Judicature and the Court of Chancery were transferred from the New York County Clerk’s Office to the New York State Archives in Albany (read Geof Huth’s part 1 & part 2 of his account of the transfer of documents – Geof is the Chief Records Officer and Chief Law Librarian of the New York State Unified Court System). These records joined nearly 5,000 cubic feet of records from upstate court offices that were transferred to the State Archives in 1982, thereby creating a complete, statewide resource of historical court records dating from 1683 to 1847.

Inaugural Event of the St. John’s University School of Law Chapter of the Historical Society of the New York Courts

October 10, 2018October 24, 2018Historical Society of the New York CourtsUncategorized, John Q. Barrett, Law School Society Chapters, New York State Judges, Society Event Recap, Young Lawyers Committee

This article was written by Danielle Stefanucci, St. John’s School of Law class of 2020 and Alumni Chair of the new St. John’s University School of Law Chapter of the Historical Society of the New York Courts. Special thanks to Mollie Galchus, President of the St. John’s Chapter and to Prof. John Q. Barrett, Chapter faculty advisor and Society Trustee, for all their help establishing the new Society Chapter at St. John’s!

Photo: Mollie Galchus introducing the evening’s speakers. Sitting (L-R): Prof. John Q. Barrett, Hon. Saliann Scarpulla, and Hon. Alan D. Scheinkman

On the evening of Tuesday, October 2nd, the St. John’s University School of Law Chapter of the Historical Society of the New York Courts held its inaugural event. The Organization of the New York Courts (and How It Came to be This Way) was held at the law school and drew first-year and upper-class students, professors, and community members. Two veteran New York State judges, Hon. Alan D. Scheinkman, ’75, Presiding Justice, Appellate Division, Second Department and Hon. Saliann Scarpulla, Justice, NYS Supreme Court, Commercial Division, New York County, headlined the event. Justice Scheinkman, a St. John’s School of Law alumnus, walked the gathered students and professors through the history of the statewide court system. He traced the origins of the New York Supreme Court back to 1691, to a court of general jurisdiction then called the Supreme Court of Judicature.

Answering the oft-asked first-year law student question of why New York calls its lowest court the Supreme Court, Justice Scheinkman claimed that “it’s New York—we make everything complicated.” He further detailed the mid-nineteenth century changes to the court system: the distinction between law and equity was abolished and the New York Court of Appeals established. Finally, Justice Scheinkman discussed the New York court system as it works today in practice: it is overseen by the Chief Judge of the State of New York, a position held by Hon. Janet DiFiore, ’81. The Court of Appeals judgeships were formerly elected positions, but in the 1970s they became appointed by the Governor through a nominating commission. Layers of administrative judges assist the Chief Judge in managing the court’s 18,000 employees; Justice Scheinkman himself served as an Administrative Judge in the Ninth District before being elevated to Presiding Justice of the Appellate Division.

My Garfinkel Scholarship Transformation

September 12, 2018October 24, 2018Historical Society of the New York CourtsGarfinkel Essay Scholarship, Uncategorized, Education

This article was written by Adoracion Hernandez. Ms. Hernandez is the 2018 David A. Garfinkel Essay Scholarship Second Prize winner. Born in Spain, she came to New York in 2001, when she became interested in early childhood education. She earned her Child Development Associate Credential and Associate Degree in Education from Bronx Community College. She is currently enrolled in Hunter College, working toward her Bachelor’s Degree in Special and Regular Early Childhood Education.

Photo: Adoracion Hernandez and Hon. Dianne T. Renwick at the Garfinkel Essay Scholarship Award Ceremony.

On May 21, 2018, I had the honor to receive the David A. Garfinkel Essay Scholarship at one of the hidden gems in New York City: Appellate Division, First Judicial Department. A courthouse sited in the heart of Manhattan where one can admire the impressive furniture, woodwork, artistic murals, and wonderful stained-glass artworks. The Historical Society of the New York Courts worked tirelessly to offer this generous scholarship to students studying in CUNY Community Colleges. I had just earned my Associate Degree in Applied Science at Bronx Community College when I discovered the Garfinkel Scholarship. Once I realized that I was eligible to enter, I felt compelled to start working on the essay immediately because of the interesting topic they brought to my attention: Stolen Art: from the Holocaust to the Present. I have always loved History. I was lucky to be raised in a household in which my mother, little by little, had treasured literature books of diverse cultures, dictionaries, and several encyclopedias. I remember an Encyclopedia of World’s History — bought one chapter each week until all the volumes were complete — which I used to read for fun on vacation days.

I spent Spring Break this year working with great hopes on the essay I planned to submit. Thankfully, my children understood the importance of my work and didn’t complain about spending their vacation at home. During my research, I learned in dismay that most of the stolen art hoarded by the Nazis during the rise of their monstrous regime was almost never returned to its rightful owners. In fact, the few families who successfully reclaimed their stolen works-of-art had to defy a powerful established machinery that protected individuals and local or national governments in possession of these creations by ignoring — or preferring to ignore — their outrageous origins. These dishonest persons and institutions were the real beneficiaries of the chaotic situation in the aftermath of World War II. Advancing in my research, I realized the crucial role played by the U.S. Courts — especially the New York Courts — to bring justice to the heirs of Holocaust victims. After discarding several themes and titles for my essay, finally I found the right one: “Inherited Grievances”. My focus was the unjust treatment that Holocaust victims and their families received after the defeat of the Third Reich. Fortunately, after many years of fighting to recover their lost property, some of these families finally witnessed their possessions returned to them. This restoration brought them — and all of humanity — peace of mind, knowing that justice had prevailed. My essay was ready to be submitted, however, I sought for the knowledgeable opinion of my professor: Beth Tremallo, who had been my mentor since I started my quest for ways to continue my education. She offered me wise insights, an accurate vision of what was necessary for a better result, and the encouragement I needed to revise my work until it was finally ready to submit.

Celebrating “Penn Central Day:” The 40th Anniversary of Penn Central v. City of New York

August 29, 2018October 24, 2018Historical Society of the New York CourtsUncategorized, New York Legal History, Notable Cases

This article was written by Adrian Untermyer, an urbanist who advocates for historic preservation and improved transportation in Greater New York and nationwide. Mr. Untermyer is former Deputy Director of the Historic Districts Council and began his career as a Legal Advocate at the Urban Justice Center. Now a second-year student at the University of Colorado School of Law, Untermyer is a member of the Law Review and interns in Governor John Hickenlooper’s Office of Legal Counsel. For further information and to keep in touch, visit him online at www.adrianuntermyer.com and follow him on Twitter and Instagram.

The Historical Society of the New York Courts was a proud co-sponsor of this event.

Photo: Laurie Beckelman (Associate Director, The Shed), Samuel D. Albert (Architectural Historian), Elizabeth Goldstein (President, Municipal Art Society), Kent Barwick (Former President, Municipal Art Society), Brad Vogel (Executive Director, New York Preservation Archive Project), and Adrian Untermyer (Founder and Chair, Penn Central Day Committee) blow out the “Birthday Cake’s” candles. (Photo by Shanique D. Bundy)

On Tuesday, June 26, the U.S. Supreme Court released its decision in Trump v. Hawaii, which was among the Court’s most controversial cases of 2018. But on a packed pedestrian plaza across from Grand Central Terminal, fifty New Yorkers with party hats and noisemakers toasted a different case decided exactly forty years earlier.

The occasion was the 40th Anniversary of Penn Central v. City of New York, the U.S. Supreme Court case that helped save Grand Central Terminal from destruction. The case also upheld the constitutionality of New York City’s Landmarks Law, which serves as a model for historic preservation statutes nationwide.

I noticed the upcoming anniversary while reading Penn Central v. City of New York during my first year of law school at the University of Colorado. As fortune had it, I planned to return to New York a few weeks later for an internship with Justices Rosalyn H. Richter and Ellen Gesmer of the Appellate Division’s First Department.

The Road to the Court: Court of Appeals Judges Reflect on What Shaped Their Legal Careers

August 15, 2018October 24, 2018Historical Society of the New York CourtsUncategorized, Judith S. Kaye, New York Legal History, New York State Judges, Oral Histories

Image: Official Court of Appeals portraits of Hon. Joseph W. Bellacosa, Hon. Richard C. Wesley, and Hon. Judith S. Kaye

Oftentimes, legal history focuses on the facts of the case, the letter of the law, and clearly outlining one’s argument, making it easy for perception to become lost in the technical writing. However, this is where the Historical Society’s Oral History Project enters the scene. Starting in 2005, the Society has recorded the reminiscences of some of New York’s most prominent Bench and Bar members, which includes judges from the bench of the Court of Appeals. In certain cases, Court of Appeals judges knew right away that they were interested in a career in the legal field, but not always. Read on to learn about the moments that brought these future judges to become lawyers. For more stories from these judges and other New York legal luminaries, visit our Oral History page.

Hon. Joseph W. Bellacosa (Associate Judge, 1987-2000) reflects on his upbringing in Brooklyn:

…My grandmother was a very, very tolerant woman, who when she cooked a meal, everybody sat down and ate together. So at a very early age I was sitting having meals with — at that time, African American Black guys who were working in the ice business that my grandfather founded that my father worked in, carrying ice into tenements. They sat with us as equals. It was a tremendous value piece that has affected everything in my life. And I’m very grateful to her for giving me that…

Calendar Feature: August 2018 – Rent

August 1, 2018October 24, 2018Historical Society of the New York CourtsUncategorized, New York Legal History, Notable Cases, Society Calendar

Did you know the Broadway musical Rent was involved in litigation in New York City? Learn about the case and court involved in our 2018 calendar, which is featured this month!

Image: The cast of Rent at New York Theater Workshop, 1996, photographed by Sara Krulwich for the New York Times. Copyright Sara Krulwich/The New York Times

Image: Poster for Giacomo Puccini’s opera La bohème with artwork by Aldofo Hohenstein 1896. Courtesy of Wikimedia Commons

The rock musical Rent with music, lyrics, and book by Jonathan Larson, is loosely based on Giacomo Puccini’s La Boheme and involves a group of talented young artists trying to succeed in New York.

The production first appeared at the New York Theatre Workshop in 1993. The show won a Pulitzer Prize for Drama and moved to Broadway in 1996.

On Broadway, Rent gained critical acclaim and won a Tony Award for Best Musical among other awards. The Broadway production closed on September 7, 2008 after a 12-year run of 5,123 performances.

In Thomson v. Larson, 147 F.3d 195 (2d Cir. 1998), Lynn Thomson claimed that, along with principal playwright Jonathan Larson, she co-authored a “new version” of the musical. The two, however, did not specify their respective rights by contract, and the case raised the question whether Rent qualifies as a statutory “joint work” co-authored by Thomson.

The U.S. Court of Appeals, Second Circuit determined that Thomson was not a co-author of Rent, in that she did not meet her burden of establishing that she made independent copyrightable contributions to the musical or that the parties fully intended to be co-authors.

Battle in Brooklyn: The Cross-examination of Henry Ward Beecher at the Trial of the Century

July 18, 2018October 24, 2018Historical Society of the New York CourtsUncategorized, Judicial Notice, New York Legal History, Notable Cases

This article was written by Michael A. Green. Michael was a partner at the law firm Shereff Friedman Hoffman & Goodman, and since 2009, he has been restoring the 1868 Fullerton Mansion in Newburgh, New York. In Issue 13 of Judicial Notice, the Historical Society’s journal which focuses on New York’s legal history, he explores the William Fullerton’s cross-examination of Henry Ward Beecher in greater detail. This issue will be arriving on your doorstep soon but only if you are a Society member. Don’t miss out on this terrific profile and more, join the Society now!

Image: William Fullerton, Esq. at the Tilton-Beecher trial. The Daily Graphic, February 1, 1875, vol. VI, no. 592

For nearly 140 years, writers and social historians have been fascinated by a single 1875 trial — Tilton v. Beecher. The underlying story of an ill-fated love triangle combined Shakespearean elements of high drama with tabloid level juicy scandal.

Reverend Henry Ward Beecher’s outspoken views had generated a list of enemies to rival nearly any major American historical figure, and in the background, were larger issues that presage today’s “culture wars.”