Common Threads of Justice: Weaving Threads in Our Video Archives

Posted on Categories Common Threads of Justice, Blog, Court of Appeals Judges, Judith S. Kaye, New York Legal History, Women & the Law, Women History Month1 Comment on Common Threads of Justice: Weaving Threads in Our Video Archives
We miss seeing you in person, but we can stay connected!

As we all adjust to social distancing which prevents us from bringing you our live programming, and as we look for ways to nourish our brains and spirits, we are inaugurating today a new series: Common Threads of Justice.

In this new series, we’ll showcase the common threads that weave the tapestry of NYS legal history, presented through our program videos.

Another Look at Judith S. Kaye

For our first foray, we’re looking to our incomparable founder Judith S. Kaye in a celebration of Women’s History Month. Judge Kaye is certainly a trailblazing woman who needs little introduction, so click to revisit past events you may have missed or wish to watch again!

Honoring Lady Justice: New York State Court of Appeals Women Jurists (2013)

Continue reading

Judicial Notice 14: 2019

Posted on Categories Judicial Notice, Publications

Issue 14

Download Judicial Notice Issue 14

Rebecca Salome Foster “The Tombs Angel” (1848-1902)

Posted on Categories Blog, New York Legal History, Public Events
This blog article was adapted from the display surrounding the monument to Rebecca Salome Foster in the rotunda at the New York County Courthouse, 60 Centre Street. It was rededicated in a ceremony on June 25, 2019. Read more about the restoration process in the New York Times article “New York’s Tribute to the ‘Tombs Angel’: Lost, Found, Now Restored.”
Mrs. Rebecca Salome Foster
Mrs. Rebecca Salome Foster

In the 1880’s, Rebecca Salome Foster, spurred by her religious faith, began to devote herself to the overlooked needs of inmates incarcerated in the original Tombs Prison (1838) in New York City, especially young and vulnerable women. Mrs. Foster acted as a one-person social services agency, probation officer, and legal aid society (at a time when those entities were either non-existent or in their infancy), providing aid to the inmates of the Tombs and their families irrespective of race or religion. She befriended the accused and counseled them, extended financial assistance to them and their families, in many cases spoke to the court on their behalf, and, in the more serious cases, obtained legal representation for them free of charge. She earned the trust of the judges of the Court of Special Sessions as a person of great integrity, sympathy, and good judgment, and, in response to their requests, investigated the background of persons charged with crimes. She sought to help ease the path of inmates back into society. Often the court, on her recommendation, suspended sentences and placed the defendants in the care of Mrs. Foster, who provided them with food, clothing, shoes, travel expenses, and a place to live, and frequently obtained employment for them. She performed this work every day, without compensation, beginning the day at Calvary Church, where she was a parishioner, and where each day groups of people came to seek her help.

Continue reading

The Braschi Breakthrough: 30 Years Later, Looking Back on the Relationship Recognition Landmark

Posted on Categories Blog, New York Legal History, Notable Cases, Public Events, The Richard C. Failla LGBTQ Commission of the New York Courts, NYS Court of Appeals

On June 3, 2019, The Richard C. Failla LGBTQ Commission of the New York Courts commemorated the 30th anniversary of the New York Court of Appeals’ decision in Braschi v. Stahl Associates Company with a program entitled The Braschi Breakthrough: 30 Years Later, Looking Back on the Relationship Recognition Landmark. The Historical Society of the New York Courts was among the event’s co-sponsors. The video of the program is available to watch below.

In Braschi, interpreting a New York City rent control regulation that protected a surviving member of a deceased tenant’s family from eviction, the Court of Appeals became the first American appellate court to conclude that same-sex relationships are entitled to legal recognition. The case was litigated at the height of the AIDS crisis and sadly, the plaintiff himself died only a year after his groundbreaking court victory.

Inside the Ceremonial Courtroom at the 60 Centre Street courthouse in Manhattan (where the Braschi case started), introductory remarks were made by Matthew J. Skinner, Executive Director of the Failla Commission; Hon. George Silver, Deputy Chief Administrative Judge for New York City; and Hon. Anthony Cannataro, the incoming Co-Chair of the Failla Commission. The speakers included William Rubenstein, Bruce Bromley Professor of Law at Harvard Law School and the man who argued the case before the Court of Appeals as a young ACLU staff attorney, Henry M. Greenberg, President of the New York State Bar Association, Vice-Chair at the Historical Society of the New York Courts, and a law clerk to Hon. Judith S. Kaye in 1989; Hon. Matthew Titone, Surrogate Judge of Richmond County and the son of Hon. Vito J. Titone (the author of the Braschi plurality opinion); former State Senator Thomas K. Duane; and Giannina Braschi, acclaimed writer and the sister of the late plaintiff Miguel Braschi.

Continue reading

Excerpt from People v. Croswell: Alexander Hamilton and the Transformation of the Common Law of Libel

Posted on Categories Blog, Judicial Notice, New York Legal History, New York State Judges, Notable Cases, Law Day, Uncategorized

The theme for Law Day 2019 is Free Speech, Free Press, Free Society, and early New York cases tested some of the protections of the First Amendment. One such case is People v. Croswell (1804), and in 2011, we published an article written by Paul McGrath in our journal Judicial Notice on Alexander Hamilton’s role in the trial. In the spirit of Law Day, we have excerpted a part below.

Paul McGrath retired after serving as Chief Court Attorney of the New York Court of Appeals in Albany where he supervised the Court’s Central Legal Research Staff. Prior to his promotion to Chief Court Attorney, Mr. McGrath worked as the Deputy Chief Court Attorney of the Court of Appeals and as a Law Clerk to Associate Judge Richard D. Simons. Mr. McGrath earned his J.D., magna cum laude, from the State University of New York at Buffalo School of Law and his B.A., magna cum laude, from the State University of New York College at Geneseo.

Photo: Harry Croswell (1778-1858) by Henry Inman, 1839. Courtesy of Mead Art Museum, Amherst College. Bequest of Herbert L. Pratt (Class of 1895), AC 1945.12

The Motion for a New Trial

Before judgment could be pronounced, Croswell’s attorneys quickly moved for a new trial, arguing initially (1) that the truth should be permitted in evidence as a justification and thus that Chief Justice [Morgan] Lewis had erred in denying the motion for a further adjournment, and (2) that the court had misdirected the jury. Following accepted practice of the time, the motion for a new trial would be heard by the entire five-justice Supreme Court — somewhat like an appeal of the judgment in modern practice. The defense attorneys would employ a legal device called the “case stated.” By “making a case,” essentially a set of facts to which the prosecution and defense stipulated, all objectionable matters, including any not in the record proper such as the jury charge which at the time was a matter outside the record, could be considered by the full Court.25 Following certain adjournments, the case was finally heard in February 1804 with the Supreme Court sitting in Albany. In accord with the practice of the day, the parties would not exchange briefs before the argument.26

The defense team used the time to regroup. The Federalists sought out Alexander Hamilton who, according to Justice (later Chancellor) James Kent, was “universally conceded” to be the preeminent lawyer of the era.27 As early as June 23, 1803, they had persuaded General Philip Schuyler, Hamilton’s father-in-law, to write the former Secretary of the Treasury for help. The rabid Federalist Schuyler described the case as “a libel against that Jefferson, who disgraces not only the place he fills but produces Immorality by his pernicious example.”28 Although there is some evidence that Hamilton played an advisory role in the Croswell trial in the Circuit Court, other matters had precluded his appearing there. Now he was ready to enter the proceedings in person, gratis.

Continue reading

Franklin H. Williams Documentary: A Film Celebrating His Life and Contributions

Posted on Categories Uncategorized, Blog, New York Legal History, Franklin H. Williams Judicial Commission

This article was written by John Caher, the Unified Court System’s senior advisor for strategic and technical communications.

Photo: Franklin H. Williams

Franklin Hall Williams: Civil rights leader, lawyer, diplomat, organizer of the Peace Corps and first African-American director, United Nations representative, foundation president, associate of Thurgood Marshall, New York attorney. He was a visionary and trailblazer who devoted his life to the pursuit of civil rights — not through acrimony or violence, but through reason and example. His enduring legacy, the Franklin H. Williams Judicial Commission, continues to promote racial and ethnic fairness in the courts.

Joyce Y. Hartsfield, Executive Director of the Franklin H. Williams Judicial Commission, and I thought it was unfortunate that Williams, who died in 1990, was but a footnote to history, although his impact on civil rights and the New York Courts was profound and lasting. A recent Pulitzer Prize winning book Devil in the Grove by Gilbert King documented Williams’ role in the infamous Groveland Boys case, but it seemed no one had really taken a good look at his life’s work and contributions. We decided to produce a short documentary, and with the financial support of the New York State Unified Court System, the New York State Bar Foundation and the Historical Society of the New York Courts, the fruits of our efforts are now publicly available.

The film is narrated by Elaine Jones, former director-counsel of the NAACP Legal Defense Fund (LDF). Former New York State Bar Association President Kenneth G. Standard is the voice of Ambassador Williams. And we were blessed to have a generous and tireless (and unpaid) consultant, Dr. Enid Gort, an anthropologist working on a book about Franklin Williams.

Continue reading

Judicial Notice 13: 2018

Posted on Categories Publications, Judicial Notice

Issue 13

Watch Chatting with the Authors: A Series of our Podcast
Episode 3: Associate Editor, Style Editor David L. Goodwin interviews author Robert Pigott about his two Judicial Notice profiles of prominent New York attorneys: Elihu Root and William M. Evarts.
Episode 8: Guest host Daniel F. Loud interviews author Hon. Robert S. Smith about his article on James Kent, and the how judging has changed and stayed the same since Kent’s time. 

Download Judicial Notice Issue 13

Judicial Notice 12: 2017

Posted on Categories Judicial Notice, Publications

Issue 12

Women’s Rights and Women Pioneers in New York State
Emancipation of Slaves in the State of New York
A New York Legal Luminary

Download Judicial Notice Issue 12

Fritz Winfred Alexander, II: First Black Court of Appeals Judge Appointed to a 14-Year Term

Posted on Categories Uncategorized, Blog, Black History Month, Court of Appeals Judges, New York Legal History, New York State Judges
This article was written by Angela Burton, and is an excerpt of her biography of Judge Alexander, which was originally published in The Judges of the New York Court of Appeals, edited by Albert M. Rosenblatt and published by Fordham University Press in 2007. You can read the full biography here.

Born Carl Bernard Zanders, Jr., in Apopka, Florida, on April 24, 1926, Fritz Winfred Alexander, II was later given the name of his mother’s brother, a Gary, Indiana, lawyer with whom he went to live after his mother became ill.[1] Upon surveying the Judge’s long and illustrious legal career, it becomes apparent that the elder Alexander gifted to his young nephew not only his euphonious name, but also imparted a drive for excellence, an inclination toward public service and social justice, and a passion for the rule of law.

Judge Alexander’s appointment to the Court of Appeals on January 2, 1985 by Governor Mario Cuomo marked a significant milestone in the Court’s history: he was the first Black American to be appointed to a full fourteen-year term on the Court.[2] Upon his nomination, the fourteen-member Committee on Judicial Selection of the New York State Bar Association judged him to possess “pre-eminent qualifications” and concluded that he was “well-qualified” for the position of Associate Judge of the Court of Appeals. Although the Judge was keenly aware of historical and social import of his appointment, he was adamant that his paramount allegiance on the Court was to the people of New York and to the rule of law. At his confirmation hearings before the Senate Judiciary Committee (which voted his nomination unanimously), he acknowledged the “symbolic significance” of his status as the first Black American to be elevated to a full term on the Court of Appeals,[3] and upon taking the bench insisted that he was appointed not because of his race, but because he was “a good judicial choice,” and that his paramount role was “to serve the people of this state as a judge of this court.”[4] On the occasion of his leaving the Court after only seven years into his term, and four years shy of the mandatory retirement age of 70, he remarked that he most wanted to be known “as a jurist who sought to discharge his responsibilities to the very best of his ability, to serve justice and the rule of law, and about whom it can be said ‘job well done.”[5]

Continue reading

Founding President Hon. Albert M. Rosenblatt Hands Gavel to Hon. Jonathan Lippman, New President of the Historical Society of the New York Courts

Posted on Categories Uncategorized, Blog, Court of Appeals Judges, Judith S. Kaye, New York State Judges, Historical Society

Photo: Outgoing president and founding member of the Society Hon. Albert M. Rosenblatt offers hand-made gavel to our new President, Hon. Jonathan Lippman, and new Chair of the Board, Stephen P. Younger at our annual meeting in January 2019.

(L-R): Hon. Jonathan Lippman, Hon. Carmen Beauchamp Ciparick, Hon. Albert M. Rosenblatt, Stephen P. Younger, Marilyn Marcus

We knew the day would come but it still feels a bit surreal. Hon. Albert M. Rosenblatt, President of the Historical Society of the New York Courts for the past 16 years, has turned over presidential leadership to Hon. Jonathan Lippman, former NYS Chief Judge and Of Counsel at Latham & Watkins LLP. The announcement was made during the annual meeting of the Society’s Board of Trustees in mid-January. Judge Rosenblatt, retired Associate Judge at the Court of Appeals, co-founded the Society in 2002 with then-Chief Judge Judith S. Kaye.

The Board also elected Stephen P. Younger, Partner at Patterson Belknap Webb & Tyler LLP, as Chair of the Board, replacing Hon. Carmen Beauchamp Ciparick, Of Counsel at Greenberg Traurig LLP and former NYS Court of Appeals Associate Judge.

During the annual meeting, the Society’s Executive Director Marilyn Marcus read to the Board letters from Chief Judge Janet DiFiore to Judges Rosenblatt and Ciparick recognizing their service and commitment. The Chief Judge expressed her high regard and warm thoughts to them both.

Judge Rosenblatt presented a hand-made gavel to Judge Lippman and to Mr. Younger during the announcement.

Continue reading

×
Product added to cart

No products in the cart.